Funeral protest laws have cropped up across the country in recent years in response to the picketing activities of the Westboro Baptist Church, founded by former attorney Fred Phelps. Members of the Kansas-based entity believe that U.S. soldiers are dying in the Iraq War because the United States does not condemn homosexuality. The group pickets the funerals of slain soldiers, bearing repugnant messages such as “God Hates Fags,” “No Fags in Heaven,” and “Fags Are Worthy of Death.”

Legislators across the country responded to the protests, which have been conducted in more than 40 states, by passing laws that seek to prohibit such protests during the hour before and after a funeral procession. Many of the laws also impose a distance requirement — often three hundred feet — on such protests. Supporters of the legislation contend the measures are an appropriate way to protect the privacy rights of the deceased’s family. Opponents counter that the legislation was passed to suppress the free expression rights of an unpopular group.

The first funeral protest law was passed in 1992. Phelps successfully challenged part of the Kansas Funeral Picketing Act of 1992 in Phelps v. Hamilton (10th Cir. 1997), provoking the Kansas legislature to clarify the time periods in which such protests were prohibited. For its part, Congress passed the Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act and the Respect for the Funerals of America’s Fallen Heroes Act, which President George W. Bush signed in May 2006 and December 2006, respectively. The Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act prohibits funeral protests during one hour before and after a funeral under the control of Arlington National Cemetery. It also prohibits such activity within 300 feet of a cemetery. The Respect for the Funerals of America’s Fallen Heroes Act applies to military funerals that are not under the control of Arlington National Cemetery or the National Cemetery Association. It imposes a similar time and distance ban.

More than 40 states have passed funeral protest laws.  Numerous challenges have been filed to these laws on First Amendment grounds.  The Westboro Baptist church had some initial success challenging certain funeral protest laws in Kentucky and Missouri.  However, in more recent decisions, particularly at the federal appeals court level, the ordinances survive review. 

In 2010, the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Ohio’s funeral protest law in Phelps-Roper v. Strickland (2010).  The Sixth Circuit compared the funeral protest law to the law prohibiting picketing outside private residences upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Frisby v. Schultz (1989).   The Funeral Protest Provision only restricts picketing or other protest activities  that are directed at a funeral or burial service,” the Sixth Circuit wrote. 

In 2017, the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Nebraska’s funeral protest law  from a First Amendment challenge by the Westboro Baptist Church.  The appeals court in Phelps-Roper v. Ricketts (8th Cir. 2017) reasoned that the law was content-neutral, left open alternative means of communication, and was narrowly drawn. The Westboro Baptist Church petitioned for Supreme Court review but the Court denied review in November 2017. 

In a related matter, the United States Supreme Court protected the right of the Westboro Baptist Church to engage in lawful protest outside a church in Maryland in Snyder v. Phelps (2011)  In   2007, a federal jury imposed nearly $11 million in damages against the Phelpses in a suit brought by the father of a man killed in the Iraq war whose funeral was protested by Westboro Baptist Church. Albert Snyder sued the Phelpses for intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, and civil conspiracy. In February 2008, the district court reduced the amount to $5 million.  The Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed on appeal.  The U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the Fourth Circuit’s rejection of the jury verdict.  Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. reasoned that the protestors’ speech touched on matters of public concern or importance. He also emphasized that the protestors conducted themselves peacefully on public streets pursuant to police directives.

Send Feedback on this article