Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor (Photo by Steve Petteway, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States)
Sonia Sotomayor, (1954 - ) is an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court who also has served as a federal district court and a federal appeals court jurist in her career. Since her appointment to the Court in 2009, Sotomayor generally has been a consistent defender of First Amendment values on the bench.
Born in the Bronx, Sotomayor attended Cardinal Spellman High School where she was valedictorian. She then earned her undergraduate degree from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude. She then obtained her law degree from Yale Law School and served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal.
After her law school graduation, Sotomayor served as an assistant district attorney in New York beginning in 1979. In 1984, she entered private practice with a commercial litigation law firm. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush appointed her to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where she presided until 1998. That year, President Bill Clinton elevated her to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. In 2009, President Barack Obama elevated her to the U.S. Supreme Court. Congress confirmed her by a vote of 68 – 31. She became the first Hispanic justice after her confirmation.
Sotomayor wrote the opinion for a unanimous Court in Lane v. Franks (2014), providing that a public university employee could not be fired for providing truthful in-court testimony. “There is considerable value, moreover, in encouraging, rather than inhibiting, speech by public employees,” he wrote in her opinion, invoking the Court’s seminal public employee decision Pickering v. Bd. of Educ. (1968).
She also authored the opinion for a unanimous Court in Milavetz, Gallop, & Milavetz v. United States (2010), upholding provisions of the Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act from free-speech challenges.
Most recently, Sotomayor expressed concerns about the Court’s true-threat jurisprudence in a special concurring opinion in the denial of certiorari in Perez v. Florida (2017).She explained that in the appropriate case the Court needed to clarify the level of intent required to convict someone under a true-threat statute.Send Feedback on this article