The Supreme Court in Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939), struck down on First Amendment grounds city ordinances limiting the distribution of handbills.
Los Angeles, California, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and Worcester, Massachusetts, had passed ordinances prohibiting the distribution of all handbills on city streets and sidewalks that resulted in subsequent littering, and Irvington, New Jersey, had one that also limited house-to-house distributions except for cases in which individuals had obtained a permit from the chief of police. The cities had applied the laws to individuals distributing handbills involving the Spanish Civil War, a labor dispute, a protest meeting involving unemployment insurance, and the faith of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
In the opinion for the 8-1 majority, Justice Owen J. Roberts recognized the rights of municipalities to keep streets open to traffic and other reasonable restrictions, but added that localities must recognize that the freedoms of speech and press are “fundamental personal rights” that lie “at the foundation of free government by free men.” The Court had previously emphasized such rights in striking down discretionary licensing provisions in Lovell v. City of Griffin (1938) and Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (1939).
The cities had attempted to distinguish their ordinances from these and similar cases on the basis that they were attempting to address the problem of littering. Roberts asserted that there were less intrusive ways to accomplish this goal, including fining individuals who littered. In a similar vein, Irvington could find other methods of securing homeowners from trespasses and frauds other than by vesting the police chief with the power to censor through licensing. Justice James C. McReynolds dissented without a written opinion.Send Feedback on this article