Congress passed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act to provide enhanced penalties for hate crimes. The law does not penalize speech per se unless it is intended to incite violence. Matthew Shepard, pictured here, was a University of Wyoming student who was tortured, beaten and left to die near Laramie, Wyo., in 1998. Questions were raised about what role Shepard's sexual orientation played in the commission of the crime.
In recent years, there has been renewed attention to crimes that are committed as a result of an individual’s race, religion, or perceived sexual orientation. This concern was heightened after the brutal murders of Matthew Shephard and James Byrd Jr., the first for his sexual orientation and the second for his race.
In the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Congress had already provided for federal investigation and prosecution on crimes involving race, color, religion or national origin. In 2009, Congress widened this law with the passage of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Consistent with the Supreme Court decision in Wisconsin v. Mitchell, the law was designed to provide enhanced penalties in hate crimes also involving “gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability” that was in or affected interstate or foreign commerce. Because of First Amendment concerns, the law does not penalize speech per se unless the speech is intended to incite violence.
There have been a number of successful prosecutions under the law.Send Feedback on this article