Information for MTSU Faculty who work with Human Subjects
- Protocols are prescreened within 4 days of submission. You will receive an email
at the completion of this process. If you do not receive an email, please contact
us.
-
It generally takes two weeks for protocols to be reviewed after the IRB office has
prescreened them and confirmed the application packet to be complete.
-
The MTSU IRB receives a higher number of applications during September-October and
February-March. We request your patience during these months. The MTSU IRB continues
to receive IRB applications during the summer break (June-August).
This page is intended to assist MTSU faculty members who may be required to obtain
IRB approval or sponsor a student for IRB approval. Faculty research could be relevant
to one or more of these categories:
- Faculty serving as sponsor - the faculty member may either be an academic advisor
or research supervisor of a student whose research involves humans. The faculty member
may not be the primary beneficiary of the research outcomes.
- Faculty responsible for class projects - the faculty member is a course director of
an MTSU educational program that requires the collection of data from human subjects.
- Faculty conducting independent study - the faculty member is either a PI or an active
co-investigator in a study involving human participants. Faculty members who fall
under this category are usually familiar with the IRB processes and may need very
minor assistance. The faculty member may have students or postdocs conduct several
tasks within the study, but the faculty member is the chief beneficiary of the research
outcome.
Training
Regardless of which of the above categories the faculty member is associated with,
he/she must complete CITI training in order to be eligible for the designated role.
Since students do not have the institutional authority, they cannot take on responsibilities
that may potentially cause irreversible challenges to their academic status. Hence,
the IRB requires that the faculty in charge be adequately trained in human subject
research and be familiar with various IRB procedures. As a first step, we encourage
faculty to view the following informative videos available through the Office for
Human Research Protections (ORHP) to understand the history and role of the IRB in
human subjects research:
The above videos provide an overall understanding, but merely watching them does not
meet MTSU's human subject training requirement. Once you have watched these video
clips, please visit CITI program www.citiprogram.org to complete your training.
- First-time users must register for an account using your official name (Ensure that the first and last names you provide to CITI match your MTSU records
and your IRB applications).
- You will be asked a series of questions by the CITI portal to automatically determine
which training module would most fit your needs.
- Faculty and staff must complete the "Social and Behavioral Research" course AND applicable "optional" modules depending on the type of research and group
of participants.
- In most instances, the Office of Research Compliance will be able to access your course
completion information. However, be prepared to provide proof of certification if
directed by the IRB or the Office of Research Compliance.
1. Faculty Serving as a Sponsor
The faculty member may either serve as an academic advisor or as a thesis mentor to
a student who conducts research that involves data collection from living human subjects.
In some instances, you may be an MTSU staff member who has been assigned to mentor
student research projects. We have encountered several scenarios where the faculty
mentor's primary field of interest may not entail human subjects. There may be a
secondary interest that connects the student research project and the faculty member.
In some cases, the faculty advisor was assigned to a student by Academic Affairs and
the student decides to work with human subjects. Regardless of the reason, the faculty
sponsor is granted the institutional authority and the consequent regulatory responsibility.
The main responsibility is to ensure that the student is compliant. Therefore,
it is essential that the study sponsor is familiar with IRB steps and the regulatory
responsibilities before accepting mentorship of a student.
1.1 Application Procedure
Depending on the type of research the student plans to conduct, there may be different
sets of paperwork he/she would be required to submit. If this is your first time
sponsoring a student, the Office of Research Compliance encourages you to email
irb_information@mtsu.edu and request a meeting for advice on how to proceed. In most instances, please be
aware that the student you sponsor must provide the following mandatory items for
your review before you can forward the application packet to the IRB:
- Fully completed application form for your endorsement or signature. (Please note that
a physical "ink" signature is not necessary. Entering your name in the signature
field using MS Word is sufficient.) Submit the original Word document to allow MTSU
IRB to capture your signature and other embedded macros.
- Exempt form - READ
- Expedited form - READ
- Full Committee Review form - READ
- Informed Consent document - READ
- Recruitment material, such as flyers, email transcript, etc - VIEW.
- Proof that the student has completed CITI training.
- Applicable permission letters if the study is conducted outside MTSU.
- Study instruments, such as surveys. The student should ensure that all of the modules
are operational before sending for IRB review if he/she will conduct the study through
an online site.
Please review the application and the supporting documents for completeness and submit the
application packet via a single email to
irb_submissions@mtsu.edu after you have indicated your approval by entering your name and date. Please DO
NOT combine the files, but instead attach them separately. Enclose a note in the
email to clearly indicate that you will be supporting the student and you will be
responsible for the post-approval regulatory processes (
READ). It may speed the process to also copy the research team, including the student
PI, when you email the packet. This will also enable the student to respond to any
reviewer questions. Always use your MTSU email ID when applicable.
1.2 Sponsor Responsibilities
Please be aware that if a student is required to either generate an expedited application
or attend a full committee review, it is critical that the student receive guidance
from an advisor who has working experience with IRB matters. Therefore, you may request
the student to invite a faculty co-investigator who is specialized in human subject
research. It is essential that you are aware of the research activities and ensure
that the protocol is followed without any deviation. In the event there are deviations,
immediately report non-compliance to the compliance hotline
compliance@mtsu.edu. Also, familiarize yourself with the responsibilities of the Principal Investigator
(PI) (
READ) and the post-approval responsibilities (
READ) of the research team. Even accidental violations of the approved protocol may
result in the withdrawal of the data, leading to serious consequences to the student's
academic status.
In addition to the critical role during the approval process, the sponsor is also
charged with additional post-approval responsibilities. Since the PI is a student,
all of the responsibilities are shared between the sponsor and the PI (
READ). Moreover, the sponsor must ensure that the research-related records and documents
are stored properly in accordance with the approved protocol for at least three (3)
years after the data collection has ceased. Therefore, it is important that the sponsor
is familiar with the post-approval tasks
(READ).
Please visit the IRB's FAQ page for specific information.
Click
2. Faculty Responsible for Class Projects
In this scenario, the faculty member is most likely a course director or someone who
is responsible for a class which involves conducting a small human subject study as
part of the curriculum. The responsible individual could be full time faculty, temporary
faculty, part-time faculty, staff or even an adjunct faculty member. Regardless of
rank and affiliation with MTSU, their compliance role is the same as that described
under "Sponsor" in the previous section. The faculty member in this case has two
options to consider: (1) an IRB approval can be requested by the faculty member for
the entire class project - also known as a "standing protocol;" or (2) the students
can apply for individual IRB approval - referred to as a "student-initiated protocol."
There are a few factors that need to be considered before a choice is made.
2.1 Standing Protocols
This process is useful in instances where the IRB experience is not the focus of the
curriculum, but the students would conduct a short study to meet their academic requirements.
The course director designs the methods of the study and takes ownership of the research.
Once the research framework is constructed, the faculty member would apply for an
IRB approval as a principal investigator (PI) through a workflow described in the
"Application Procedure" described above. Student researchers will not be added at
the application stage. Depending on the type of research design, the application
needs to be furnished in the appropriate format and will be reviewed accordingly.
Since the class requirements are unique, it is essential that the faculty member
consults with the Office of Research Compliance for clear guidance on what supporting
documents will be required. Once the protocol is approved, the faculty member can
request amendments to include student researchers AFTER the students have successfully
completed their CITI training.
Please note that this protocol set-up may be a one-time time commitment for the faculty
member. If the class project involves minimal risk and it qualifies for exemption,
the IRB approval for the class is valid for several years. If the class project is
reviewed under the expedited or full committee review mechanism, then it is valid
for 3 years with a few requirements. The protocol can be extended beyond 3 years
in most cases. The Office of Research Compliance recommends that course directors
consider this mechanism if the student research segment of the course is short and
is not a major component of the curriculum. The responsibilities of the students
who would like to register through this option are provided on the student information
page.
The MTSU IRB has issued standing protocols for a few a classes as a test. Based on
the limited data, the students will likely experience the following advantages and
disadvantages when class project research is conducted through this mechanism:
Advantages:
- The "standing protocol" has preassigned procedures so the students have few tasks
other than completing their appropriate CITI training.
- The class coordinator handles all of the compliance-related issues.
- For the faculty, record keeping is limited to just one protocol. As described later,
the course director is responsible for all research activities carried out through
the class, which includes record keeping. By using this mechanism, the course director
does not have to initiate multiple protocols for each class.
Disadvantages:
- This mechanism allows less flexibility for the students to customize their research
design.
- The student cannot continue the project for higher studies.
- The student will miss out on the education experience of developing a human subject
research protocol and participating in the IRB review process.
- For the faculty member, the initial IRB approval process may be time consuming.
2.2 Student-initiated Protocols
The students MUST complete CITI training before the class semester starts and they must inform the class coordinator that
the student will be requesting an individual protocol. This option is expected to
have the following implications for students:
Advantages:
- The student receives first-hand experience of the IRB process.
- The student has more independence in research design, but the faculty member must
ensure that the design is compliant.
- There is a possibility for publication.
- There is a provision to utilize the study as part of future research ventures (e.g.,
thesis, dissertation, funding request).
Disadvantages:
- May be very challenging and for both the student and the faculty member.
- May be time-consuming if not dealt with properly - IRB approval may take anywhere
from 2-4 weeks, leaving very little time for completing the project.
- A clear direction may not be available. The regulatory conditions can often be study-specific.
The protocol application must be carried out as described above in the "Application
Procedure" subsection. Within this provision, the course director will have the same
responsibility as a Sponsor.
2.3 Course Director's Responsibilities
Regardless of whether the course director used a "standing protocol" mechanism or
he/she allowed a student-initiated application, the course director is charged with
record keeping responsibilities and communication with the Office of Research Compliance
for pre- and post-approval processes. While the "standing protocol" mechanism allows
a reduced workload for the course director, it is essential that he/she make a choice
such that the academic goals are met adequately.
If the course director is not familiar with IRB procedures, he/she must be aware that
students should receive proper guidance in the event a student is required to either
generate an expedited application or asked to attend a full committee review. Therefore,
the course director must consider inviting, or allowing to student to request, a different
faculty member who is specialized in human subject research to be a co-mentor in the
study. It is also important to note that the course director must be aware of all
of the activities of the research and ensure that the protocol is followed without
deviation. In the event there are deviations, immediately report non-compliance to
the compliance hotline
compliance@mtsu.edu. Also, familiarize yourself with the responsibilities of the Principal Investigator
(PI) (
READ) and the post-approval responsibilities (
READ) of the research team. Even accidental violations of the approved protocol may result
in the withdrawal of the data, leading to serious consequences to the students' academic
status.
In addition to the critical role during the approval process, the faculty sponsor is
also charged with additional post-approval responsibilities. Since the PI is a student,
all of the responsibilities are shared between the sponsor and the PI (
READ). Moreover, the sponsor to ensure that the research-related records and documents
are stored properly in accordance with the approved protocol for at least three (3)
years after the data collection has ceased. Therefore it is important that the sponsor
is familiar with the post-approval tasks
(READ).
Please visit the FAQ page for specific information.
Click
3. Faculty Conducting Independent Study
The faculty member may either serve as a PI or a specialist co-investigator in a study.
If the faculty member is also the PI, then he/she is charged with all of the regulatory
responsibilities. Please note that the faculty member will be allowed to have students
or postdocs work in the proposed research, and "independent" does not mean that the
faculty member would conduct the study alone.
3.1 Application Procedure
Depending on the type of research, there may be different sets of paperwork that
the faculty member would be required to submit. In general, the PI must provide the
following mandatory documents:
- Fully completed application form
- Exempt form - READ
- Expedited form - READ
- Full Review form - READ
- Informed consent document - READ
- If working with minors, the researchers must provide a template for parental consent
and child assent.
- In rare cases, a waiver to consent may be granted. The researcher must submit a consent
waiver form. READ
- Recruitment material, such as flyers, email transcript, etc. VIEW
- Applicable permission letters if the study is conducted outside MTSU.
- Study instruments, such as surveys. The PI should ensure that all of the modules
are operational before sending them for IRB review if the study will be conducted
online.
Once you are confident that the application is complete, submit the application packet
via email to irb_submissions@mtsu.edu. DO NOT COMBINE all of the files together -- attach the files separately in the
same email. It may speed the process if you would also copy the research team, including
any student researchers, when you email the packet. This will also enable the students
to respond to any reviewer questions. Always use an MTSU email ID when applicable.
Incomplete applications that lack the necessary documentation will not be reviewed.
The Office of Research Compliance will return incomplete applications without any
administrative action.
3.2 Responsibilities
If a faculty PI has student co-investigators, the faculty menber is required to provide
adequate guidance to the students and interns. In the event there are deviations,
immediately report non-compliance to the compliance hotline
compliance@mtsu.edu. In addition, familiarize yourself with the responsibilities of the PI (
READ) and the post-approval responsibilities (
READ) of the research team. Please be aware that even accidental violations of the approved
protocol may result in the withdrawal of the data.
Please visit the FAQ page for specific information.
Click
New Faculty members who have recently accepted a position at MTSU can also call 615-494-8918.